studyproposal怎么写( 二 ) _studyproposal

4.写proposal都要具备哪些要素Your BackgroundUsing bullet points, state professional qualifications, skills, experiences, abilities and prior practice that are relevant to your proposal.Outline ProposalDescribe your precise area of interest and research/study you wish to undertake demonstrating your contextual knowledge.Describe the core of your project in three to four sentences.Outline the context in which your project operates answering questions such as: Why is your project relevant? Who might be its audience(s)?DevelopmentRefer to specific areas, critical ideas and precedents, which underpin and frame your proposal.This section invites you to extend the description of your project focusing on specific areas. Particularly important is your evaluation of precedents and how you position your project in relationship to these.ResearchOutline the sequence of practical, of theoretical and of visual research that you intend to follow.This section requires you to be specific about how you plan to conduct your project and where particular challenges might lie.EvaluationEvaluate your work to date. Which conclusions are you are able to draw?Where do you think the strengths of your work lie and where are areas you might improve?ResourcesDocument resources that you have drawn on as part of your research towards your proposal including professional contacts, libraries, museums, galleries, special archives or collections.Document any professional contacts that might support the delivery of your project. These might be drawn from the list above and / or extend to your access to research or production facilities, potential collaborators etc.BibliographyPlease give clear references of any relevant documentary material including books, images, videos, objects, artworks, online sources etc.Appendix (optional)This section is optional. You can insert any additional material that you consider relevant but not a core part of your project proposal. This could be other projects, notebooks, drawings, company analyses, or additional research material.以上答案摘自meeloun教育网。
5.关于research proposal中的research method怎么写Project Design and Methods Sample discussions of the methods Sample 1:2.Methods Data collection The data for the study were collected from 278 Internet users in the US and 347 Internet users in Korea over a 3-month period. In both places, student volunteers were instructed to obtain surveys from individuals in various age categories to allow greater generalizability of the findings. They were asked to make sure that the respondents had access to the Internet. The volunteers were also instructed to explain the research and the nature of participation to the respondents. This technique was chosen not only to increase response rates and minimize wasted questionnaires but also because researchers in Korea had found that the mail survey method was highly ineffective, frequently resulting in a very low response rate and/or a high rate of unusable responses (Shim and Cho, 2000). In order to increase the person's desire to participate in the study, a small gift was presented to all respondents.The respondents were asked to visit the JCPenney website in their respective countries (jcpenney.com for the US and jcpenneykorea.com for Korea). They were then asked to browse the site for 15–20 min, scrolling up and down the pages, clicking on links and using any features that interested them on the site. After reviewing the site, the participants were asked to fill out the questionnaire. JCPenney was chosen because it was one of a few International companies operating retail websites in both countries that were ideally parallel in format, design, amount and type of information provided, product categories offered and types of consumer services provided.1 Jcpenneykorea.com was launched in May 2001 by JCPenney International Catalog Korea, the US chain's exclusive marketing representative for Korea. The company also operates a mail-order catalogue business and an exhibition centre in Korea. The catalogues have been distributed to approximately 300 000 customers, out of whom an estimated 100 000 have made purchases from the catalogues (The Korea Economic Daily, 2001, p. 21).The self-administered questionnaire consisted of three sections. The first section contained 36 questions from WebQual? tapping 12 different dimensions of website quality. The second section included questions assessing the respondents' satisfaction with the site and their behavioural intention to purchase from the site. The final section consisted of questions about the respondents' demographic characteristics (i.e. age, education, gender, income and marital status). Additionally, they were asked how many years they had been using the Internet, how many times they had purchased from an online retailer in the past year, and whether or not they had previously purchased from the JCPenney website. For the US sample, respondents were also asked whether or not they had purchased from JCPenney catalogues and how often they had shopped at the company's conventional stores.In order to preserve equivalence in cross-cultural adaptation of WebQual? scale, the questionnaire, originally written in English, was translated into Korean by both researchers. It was then translated back into English by two bilingual Koreans. One of the researchers reviewed the back-translation and compared it to the original English version. As a result, modification was made in the wording of some of the questions in the Korean version of the questionnaire. Prior to the main survey, the questionnaire was also pre-tested in each country, using a small convenience sample, to ensure readability.Sample characteristics The age of the US sample ranged from 18 to 67 with an average age of 32 years, whereas the age of the Korean sample ranged from 20 to 48 with an average of 32 years. About 46% of the US respondents were older than 30 years, whereas 53% of the Koreans were above 30. Females represented 58% of the US sample (n = 162) and 48% of the Korean sample (n = 167). Fifty-nine per cent of the US sample and 50% of the Korean sample were single. Only 54% of the US respondents were employed whereas the majority of the Korean respondents (77%) were employed. Nearly half of the US sample reported an annual household income for 2001 of $50 000 or more. By contrast, only 4% of the Korean sample reported a similar household income. However, it is important to note that the average income of the Korean population in 2001 was $24 231 (Korea International Labor Foundation, 2005) compared with $42 228 for the US population (US Census Bureau, 2002). Thirty per cent of。