gmat作文怎么写( 三 )


但是这仅仅只是表面的 。不要再文章结尾重述你的观点 。
在文章的最后可以尝试引入一个新的与之相关的观点加入论述 。仔细阅读AWA prompts,并且整理其大纲和论点 。
你的大纲应该包括conclusion和the body paragraphs的内容 。这一能力可以在日常的训练中练就 。
利用反面观点是一种很好的手法——反面论证 。在文中企图掩盖argument本身的weakness是没用的 。
你的受众很可能已经了解了这一argument or issue的所有看法或者观点 。此时,如果你通过反面论证将会让你的文章更出色 。
反其道而行之,为你的essay添彩 。希望可以帮到你!~ 。
5.你们写GMAT作文都是怎么论证的GMAT是Graduate Management Admission Test的缩写,中文名称为经企管理研究生入学考试 。
新GMAT写作时间,写作规定的时间为30分钟,完成一篇论证辨析(Analysis of an Argument),文章必须用英语完成,并用键盘输入电脑 。新GMAT写作字数,官方没有要求长度或者字数,但是一般要求简洁,一般两段为佳 。
字数在400-430 words左右 。一般来说,6分的Argument字数一般为500左右,考生可以根据此来确定自己文章的字数,保证在答题过程中万无一失 。
考生在写GMAT作文时一定要根据自己找出的逻辑错误进行针对性的反击,言之有物,不要单纯的堆砌字数,文章华而不实一定不会取得理想的分数 。如何合理安排答题时间 。
1)主动训练来摆脱因时间限制产生的不适感;2)让自己熟悉考试时的时间安排;3)找到自己的写作节奏;4)收集写作素材,做到对常考话题常见素材的熟悉;5)对于不同类型的文章模板要烂熟于胸 。如何判断自己字数 。
用过prep作文界面的考生应该都知道,一行平均有18-20个单词,为简化计算,按每行20个单词来计算 。三行的段落60个单词,四行的段落80个单词,五行的段落100个单词,以此类推,如果文章有4-5个段落,建议每段不要少于3行,也不要多于6行 。
6.GMAT作文字数多少字合适The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper: Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money. Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion. 首段 This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. However, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesn't necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work environments agree. 中间段1 The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense. 中间段2 This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees. 中间段3 Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature. 末端 In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment (i.e., coal mine). Before any decision is made, all this things must be considered, not simply the reduction of payroll expenses. 1、字数高达599 。